--- title: VibeThinker-3B canonical_url: "https://www.modelscope.ai/models/WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B" md_url: "https://www.modelscope.ai/models/WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B.md" repository: WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B last_updated: 2026-06-16 license: mit pipeline_tag: text-generation tasks: - text-generation model_type: - qwen2 architectures: - Qwen2ForCausalLM base_model: - Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-3B base_model_relation: finetune parameters: 3.1B tensor_type: - BF16 library_name: - transformer - safetensors - pytorch frameworks: - Pytorch language: - en downloads: 112 stars: 0 tags: - math - code - reasoning - gpqa - instruction-following --- # VibeThinker-3B > VibeThinker-3B - An open-source model by WeiboAI on ModelScope. GitHub   |   Hugging Face   |   Technical Report WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B is a 3.1B-parameter text-generation model on ModelScope. licensed under mit. derived from Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-3B. - **Repository**: WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B - **License**: mit - **Tasks**: text-generation - **Parameters**: 3.1B - **Base model**: Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-3B - **Tags**: math, code, reasoning, gpqa, instruction-following - **Downloads**: 112 - **Stars**: 0 - **Last updated**: 2026-06-16 Source: https://www.modelscope.ai/models/WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B --- # VibeThinker-3B

GitHub  |  Hugging Face  |  Technical Report

## Introduction VibeThinker-3B is a further exploration of the VibeThinker series at the 3B-parameter scale, focusing on challenging reasoning tasks with clear verification signals, such as mathematics, coding, and STEM. By systematically optimizing the Spectrum-to-Signal Principle (SSP) post-training pipeline introduced in VibeThinker-1.5B, VibeThinker-3B achieves strong performance on AIME, HMMT, IMO-AnswerBench, LiveCodeBench, and recent LeetCode contests, reaching the performance range of top-tier frontier reasoning models, including Qwen3.6 Plus, Gemini 3 Pro, GLM-5, and Kimi K2.5, on verifiable reasoning benchmarks. Motivated by these observations, we propose the Parametric Compression-Coverage Hypothesis: different capabilities depend on model parameters in fundamentally different ways. Verifiable reasoning is closer to a highly compressible, parameter-dense capability, centered on multi-step reasoning, constraint satisfaction, self-correction, and answer verification. When the task space is sufficiently structured and feedback signals are sufficiently reliable, compact models may also carry near-frontier reasoning capabilities. In contrast, open-domain knowledge, general-purpose dialogue, and long-tail scenario understanding rely more heavily on large-scale parameters to broadly cover facts, concepts, and world knowledge. From VibeThinker-1.5B to VibeThinker-3B, our goal is not to build a small model that replaces large-scale models, but to examine the real boundaries of small models along specific capability dimensions. With VibeThinker-3B, we aim to show that small models should not be viewed merely as a compromise for reducing deployment costs. For capability domains with clear feedback and verification mechanisms, SLMs emerge as a promising research trajectory toward frontier-level performance that is fundamentally complementary to the traditional parameter scaling paradigm. ![alt text](pictures/Abstrct.png) ## Key Performance Data 📏 In terms of reasoning accuracy relative to model scale, VibeThinker-3B reaches 76.4 on IMO-AnswerBench, a highly challenging benchmark with 400 IMO-level problems, with only 3B parameters, and improves to 80.6 with Claim-Level Reliability Assessment (CLR), a test-time scaling strategy for answer-verifiable reasoning tasks. This demonstrates that a model within a strictly small-model regime can reach the performance range of substantially larger models, such as DeepSeek V3.2 (78.3, 671B), GLM-5 (82.5, 744B), and Kimi K2.5 (81.8, 1T). ![alt text](pictures/Acc_and_Scale.png) 💡 VibeThinker-3B achieves strong results across mathematics, coding, knowledge, and instruction-following benchmarks. ![alt text](pictures/VibeThiinker-3B.png) 🔁 VibeThinker-3B achieves competitive results against first-tier reasoning models and reaches the performance range of top-tier systems on several verifiable reasoning benchmarks. ![alt text](pictures/VibeThinker-3B+CLR.png) 🏆 To further test the model's out-of-distribution performance, we evaluate VibeThinker-3B on recent unseen LeetCode weekly and biweekly contests (Python) from Apr. 25 to May 31, 2026. VibeThinker-3B passes **123/128** first-attempt submissions, corresponding to a **96.1%** acceptance rate. ![alt text](pictures/LeetCode.png) ## Training Pipeline VibeThinker-3B follows the **Spectrum-to-Signal Principle (SSP)** introduced in VibeThinker-1.5B. The SFT stage constructs a broad spectrum of valid reasoning trajectories, while the RL stage amplifies correct reasoning signals using verifiable rewards. ![alt text](pictures/Architecture.png) The training pipeline contains the following stages: 1. **Curriculum-based two-stage SFT** - Stage 1 focuses on broad capability coverage across math, code, STEM reasoning, general dialogue, and instruction following. - Stage 2 shifts toward harder and longer-horizon reasoning samples. - Diversity-Exploring Distillation is used to preserve multiple valid solution paths. 2. **Multi-domain Reasoning RL** - VibeThinker-3B reuses MaxEnt-Guided Policy Optimization (MGPO). - RL is applied sequentially to math, code, and STEM reasoning tasks. - Training uses a single 64K long-context window to preserve complete long-horizon reasoning trajectories. 3. **Offline Self-Distillation** - High-quality trajectories from Math, Code, and STEM RL checkpoints are filtered and distilled back into a unified student model. - A learning-potential score is used to prioritize traces that are correct but not yet well modeled by the student. 4. **Instruct RL** - The final stage improves controllability on user-facing prompts. - Rule-based validators and rubric-based reward models are used for format-sensitive and open-ended instruction data. ## Usage Guidelines We recommend using VibeThinker-3B for competitive-style math, coding, STEM reasoning, and other tasks where the target answer can be verified. For broad open-domain knowledge tasks, larger general-purpose models may still be more suitable. For benchmark-style evaluation, the technical report uses vLLM with: - `temperature=1.0` - `top_p=0.95` - `top_k=-1` ## Quick Start Required: **transformers>=4.54.0** Recommended for better inference performance: **vLLM==0.10.1 or SGLang>=0.4.9.post6** ```python from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, GenerationConfig class VibeThinker: def __init__(self, model_path): self.model_path = model_path self.model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( self.model_path, low_cpu_mem_usage=True, torch_dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto", ) self.tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained( self.model_path, trust_remote_code=True, ) def infer_text(self, prompt): messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}] text = self.tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True, ) model_inputs = self.tokenizer([text], return_tensors="pt").to(self.model.device) generation_config = dict( max_new_tokens=102400, do_sample=True, temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=None, ) generated_ids = self.model.generate( **model_inputs, generation_config=GenerationConfig(**generation_config), ) generated_ids = [ output_ids[len(input_ids):] for input_ids, output_ids in zip(model_inputs.input_ids, generated_ids) ] return self.tokenizer.batch_decode( generated_ids, skip_special_tokens=True, )[0] if __name__ == "__main__": model = VibeThinker("WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B") prompt = "Your Prompt" print(model.infer_text(prompt)) ``` ## License The model repository is licensed under the MIT License. ## Citations & References If you use VibeThinker-3B in your research or product, please cite: ```bibtex @misc{xu2026vibethinker3bexploringfrontierverifiable, title={VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models}, author={Sen Xu and Shixi Liu and Wei Wang and Jixin Min and Yingwei Dai and Zhibin Yin and Yirong Chen and Xin Zhou and Junlin Zhang}, year={2026}, eprint={2606.16140}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.AI}, url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16140}, } ```