---
title: verified-negatives-canaputxa
canonical_url: "https://www.modelscope.ai/datasets/NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa"
md_url: "https://www.modelscope.ai/datasets/NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa.md"
repository: NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa
chinese_name: "已验证负样本-CaNaPutxa对照集"
last_updated: 2026-09-05
license: cc-by-4.0
storage_size: "2.7 MB"
downloads: 1
stars: 0
---

# verified-negatives-canaputxa

> verified-negatives-canaputxa - An open-source dataset by NKODATALABS on ModelScope. 50 LiDAR-verified stable-ground polygons (verified negatives) from two independent PNOA-LiDAR campaigns (2019/2024), Ibiza, Spain. Hard negatives for change detection. CC-BY…

NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa is a dataset on ModelScope. totalling 2.7 MB. licensed under cc-by-4.0.

- **Repository**: NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa
- **License**: cc-by-4.0
- **Storage size**: 2.7 MB
- **Downloads**: 1
- **Stars**: 0
- **Last updated**: 2026-09-05

Source: https://www.modelscope.ai/datasets/NKODATALABS/verified-negatives-canaputxa

---

# NKO Verified Negatives — Ca na Putxa control set (v0.1)

*内部备注：本卡片由NKO直接翻译为简体中文并发布，翻译日期 2026-09-02，未经专业人工译者审校。*

## English

50 LiDAR-verified stable-ground polygons (verified negatives) from two
independent PNOA-LiDAR campaigns (2019/2024), Ibiza, Spain. Hard negatives
for change detection. CC-BY 4.0.

A **hard negatives dataset** / **change detection ground truth**: 50 real,
stable-terrain polygons — **LiDAR verified no-change** examples, each with
`verdict=NO_CHANGE_DETECTED` between two real PNOA-LiDAR campaigns
(2019-11-25 → 2024-04-16, dates confirmed via GpsTime embedded in the LiDAR
points, not nominal filenames), produced by the same physical method already
used to measure the Ca na Putxa landfill (Eivissa, Spain).

### Files

- `polygons.geojson` — the 50 polygons with all properties, ready to load in QGIS/kepler.gl/Overpass turbo.
- `polygons.parquet` — same table, columnar format.
- `evidence/CTRL-*.json` — one evidence file per published polygon (50, exact 1:1 match with the table).
- `passed_polygons.json` — the same 50 selected, flat JSON (alternate format of the same table).
- `rejected_polygons.json` — the 4,327 real candidates that did NOT pass the coverage/threshold filter, complete, with rejection reason.
- `METHOD.md` — exact methodology, with the flight-date limitation disclosed, not hidden.

**Honest correction (2026-09-01):** the original script evaluated 4,757 real candidates that did pass the filter before this spatially-dispersed sample of 50 was drawn — but the full list of those 4,757 only existed in memory during the run and was never saved to disk. What wasn't kept can't be published: here are the 50 selected (complete, with evidence) and the 4,327 rejected (complete) — the 4,757-passed count is cited as a real figure from that run, not as a downloadable file.

### Why this matters

Anyone can claim "I measured a real volume change." Very few also publish
where their own method, applied to the same data, honestly says **"no
signal here"** — same threshold, same minimum coverage, and the cases that
didn't pass the filter listed separately, not hidden. That's what makes the
Ca na Putxa number (+310,357 ± 183 m³, canonical figure 2026-09-01)
credible: the same method, on terrain known not to have changed, says it
didn't change.

### License

CC-BY 4.0. Derivative work of PNOA-LiDAR (IGN/CNIG, Spain). Labeling
context: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). See `METHOD.md` for the exact
attribution.

## 简体中文

**困难负样本数据集 / 变化检测真值基准**：50个真实的、地形稳定的多边形区域——
均为**激光雷达验证的"无变化"**样本，每个样本在两次真实的PNOA激光雷达（西班牙国家航空正射影像计划）
采集之间标注 `verdict=NO_CHANGE_DETECTED`（2019年11月25日 → 2024年4月16日，
日期通过激光雷达点云中嵌入的GpsTime核实，而非文件名中的名义日期），
采用与测量Ca na Putxa垃圾填埋场（西班牙伊维萨岛）相同的物理方法生成。

### 文件说明

- `polygons.geojson` — 包含全部属性的50个多边形，可直接导入QGIS/kepler.gl/Overpass turbo。
- `polygons.parquet` — 同一数据表的列式存储格式。
- `evidence/CTRL-*.json` — 每个已发布多边形对应一个证据文件（共50个，与数据表一一对应）。
- `passed_polygons.json` — 相同的50个样本，扁平JSON格式（同一数据表的替代格式）。
- `rejected_polygons.json` — 未通过覆盖率/阈值筛选的4,327个真实候选样本，完整数据及拒绝原因。
- `METHOD.md` — 详细方法说明，如实披露飞行日期方面的局限性，不做隐瞒。

**如实说明的修正（2026-09-01）**：原始脚本在抽取本次50个空间分散样本之前，
实际评估并通过筛选的候选样本共4,757个——但该4,757个样本的完整列表仅存在于运行时内存中，
运行结束后未保存到磁盘。未保存的数据无法发布：此处提供的是最终选定的50个样本
（完整数据及证据）和未通过筛选的4,327个样本（完整数据）——4,757这一数字作为该次运行的真实统计结果引用，
但并非可下载文件。

### 为何重要

任何人都可以声称"我测量到了真实的体积变化"。但很少有人同时公开：
用同样的方法处理同样的数据，在何处会如实给出**"此处无变化信号"**的结论——
采用相同的检测阈值、相同的最低覆盖率要求，未通过筛选的样本单独列出，而非隐藏。
这正是Ca na Putxa的测量结果（+310,357 ± 183立方米，2026-09-01标准数值）可信的原因：
同一方法用于已知未发生变化的地形，得出的结论也是"未变化"。

### 许可协议

CC-BY 4.0。基于PNOA-LiDAR（西班牙国家地理研究院IGN/西班牙国家地理信息中心CNIG）数据的衍生作品。
标注上下文引用：© OpenStreetMap贡献者（ODbL协议）。详细署名方式见 `METHOD.md`。

## Contact / 联系方式

NKO Data Labs — a Delaware LLC / 特拉华州有限责任公司。
contact@nkodatalabs.com
https://nkodatalabs.com/zh-cn/products/verified-negatives/?utm_source=modelscope&utm_medium=dataset_card
